The guiding principle behind E. M. Forster's Howard's End, "Only Connect." I have attended a discussion today about Shelf-Sitting Submissives, a phenomenon whereby a submissive waits (almost interminably) for her dominant to come back and pay attention to her, requiring the underlying assumptions: a) there is no communication about how and when the Dominant will arrive, b) there is no communication about if the Dominant will arrive, c) there is no communication about what kind of waiting is actually required of the submissive i.e. is the submissive allowed to entertain the company of other dominants (chastely or otherwise), and is the submissive allowed to entertain the company of other submissives (to discuss the ways of the world and the mechanics of the D/s lifestyle from peer-perspectives); and/or d) there is no communication about anything else that is terribly important to the feelings, heart, soul, and well-being of both parties in the D/s relationship. There is no communication, really, and it makes a person feel really low. Unimportant. No longer valued. Not a priority. Unloved... depending on the self-esteem of the person to begin with.
Only connect. I am protected by a Dominant who expects me to communicate. Regularly. I am protected by a Dominant who has a set, fixed time that I can reasonably expect to meet him in-world. I am protected by a Dominant who expects me to transparently live in such a way so that he CAN protect me: he knows where I am; he knows what I wish to learn; he knows when and why I am here; and he WANTS to know. These expectations make me feel loved. I am protected by a Dominant who says it is incumbent upon HIM to make sure the lines of communication remain open, and to make sure that I obey his expectations about keeping in communication and keeping honest and keeping the energy flow... keeping the power exchange alive. It's his responsibility; it's my submission; it is our ongoing relationship. This requires effort and energy on his part. This requires time invested on his part. And time invested on my part. And this time and investment make me feel wanted, make me feel like I'm important. He protects me, but here's the crux: his protection is of my feelings. My feelings are my most vulnerable part of me, and that's what he protects with his protocol of Domination. He makes sure my feelings are healthy, fine, wanted, and attended to. This is how he protects me, and this is what protection means. Only connect -- it's not a secret to a healthy relationship... it is available to everybody.
A personal journey through my D/s lifestyle, Mastered and loved. Unauthorized use is prohibited; you may read, and you may discuss, and you may not share without my enthusiastic, explicit permission.
Showing posts with label protected precious. Show all posts
Showing posts with label protected precious. Show all posts
7.16.2012
6.22.2012
To know and to love
This is a picture of my journey. I wish the sim were still open, where I had taken this photograph. Interesting to note that there was nothing to change about it. I added a frame, my name, and called it pretty. (Sometimes the photographs that I take in Second Life are just perfect on their own. Sometimes I feel like a good photographer, not just a good digital artist.) I have been waiting to see what to do with this image: and now I realize, this is a picture of my submission. I walk an unfamiliar landscape: unfamiliar, even alien-looking to what I am used to on Earth. Some of the planks are rickety and old (values that are worn-out and under-examined for their relevance today); and some of the planks are strong and sturdy (lessons, fresh thinking, and small victories along the way that prop up the process). In the top right quadrant, I wander. I am in no hurry. I look at what is around me and I learn. Bottom right quadrant: the butterflies, the metamorphosis. The change. The beauty that awaits. The bottom left quadrant: green foliage, green space, organic growth that represents life and living and the symbiosis of relationships. Upper left quadrant: the elegant, elaborate, carefully-constructed screen that follows me -- blocks my view of certain things, shields me from certain things, protects me from foul winds, or reveals things to me slowly at the right pace. That shield is valuable. It is not a hindrance. That shield is human-constructed and elegant.
This is also a picture of my journey. It is a picture of contemplation, experimentation, and tests. (The toes in the water test like no other test...) The crossed arms love like no other love. The reflection in the water shows myself to me. And I have learned in the last 48 hours to love, love, love the good person looking back.
Most of my journey is intellectual. A little bit -- more and more -- is emotional. When I began the journey, I had no idea what scope, what vast acreage of landscape, there would be to learn and explore in the D/s lifestyle. I had no idea it was more than kneeling, devotion, and prayer that I would "be enough." I had no idea the fulfillment would be so intense; nor the emptinesses that become more pronounced. I had no idea that, when I finally asked, I would finally receive. I've been told -- and it's been proven -- that I'm allowed to ask, and I'm allowed to receive, and that it's more than okay: it's gratifying.
This is also a picture of my journey. It is a picture of contemplation, experimentation, and tests. (The toes in the water test like no other test...) The crossed arms love like no other love. The reflection in the water shows myself to me. And I have learned in the last 48 hours to love, love, love the good person looking back.
Most of my journey is intellectual. A little bit -- more and more -- is emotional. When I began the journey, I had no idea what scope, what vast acreage of landscape, there would be to learn and explore in the D/s lifestyle. I had no idea it was more than kneeling, devotion, and prayer that I would "be enough." I had no idea the fulfillment would be so intense; nor the emptinesses that become more pronounced. I had no idea that, when I finally asked, I would finally receive. I've been told -- and it's been proven -- that I'm allowed to ask, and I'm allowed to receive, and that it's more than okay: it's gratifying.
5.25.2012
"Submission" and "Stupidity"
Submissive doesn't mean stupid. Unfortunately, it often means "eager to please". And sometimes "eager to please" means doing things a person wouldn't do otherwise, such as second-guessing oneself. Or putting oneself in harm's way. Or surrendering something one wouldn't otherwise. So, even though the word "submissive" doesn't equate linguistically with "stupid", there is still the possibility that the two may co-exist in the behaviour of a submissive when dealing with a compelling dominant. And, wow, some dominants are compelling as hell. They can make you spend money. They can make you compromise your limits. They can make you laugh as easily as they can make you cry. They can make you stretch and fold and bend and snap back into position, depending on how eager you are to please. Depending on your level of approval-seeking. Depending on how much you want to show how submissive you really are. Because, sometimes it's just so easy to forget how intelligent you are when the strong voice of a compelling dom says, "wear my collar and I'll show you things" when... wait... when did the submission actually take place? Where was the negotiation of power exchange? When were limits discussed? Now you are collared. It was pretty simple for the dom to achieve. The rest is cake.
I enjoy a "protected" status (as I've mentioned a few times) as a submissive at Journey to Domination and submission. Well, the whole truth: protected AND precious. I bet my sweet ass. I have not forgotten, Sir Tony! This status means that I recognize my eager-to-please-ness; that I recognize my not-quite-ready-to-decide-without-some-help-ness; that I recognize I am too vulnerable on my own without a mentor to help guide me in big decisions. And by "vulnerable" I mean not the good kind. The good kind is whole, transparent exposure to the eyes of the right dominant. Whole, transparent exposure to the ears, heart, hands, penis, legs, liver, toys... anything the right dominant uses to enjoy his submissive. That's good vulnerability. Bad vulnerability is the feeling of exposure and deception in the presence of the wrong dominant. The dominant who uses your approval-seeking against you in order to accomplish false or temporary or incomplete mastery. The dominant who tries to sneak the collar around your neck without negotiating the strings attached, the responsibilities associated, the promises and the pledges. The dominant who will use you, in other words, instead of helping you grow, and who will not make you a priority in his life that he can talk about openly.
I have been so used, along my journey, and a key learning for me is that I had the power (whether I remembered or not) to get myself out of it, or question it, or interrogate it, or examine it out loud, before it got too bad. And, I did do these things, actually. I wish I had done so sooner, but at least I did eventually. Another key learning in general when in Second Life is that there are folks who will completely disregard what is written in one's profile (even if it's a hard limit) and they will deliberately flout those boundaries (in the name of healthy pushing which subs must also be mindful of... especially when it comes to core values being broken). A submissive will have to say, out loud, in no uncertain terms, "No, thank you, I do not wish it." Unfortunately, a submissive tends to think that, having written it down in her profile, it spares her from having to say the words out loud (because speaking them can be difficult). When talking to a compelling dom, "no" is not always easy to verbalize. And unscrupulous doms rely upon its difficulty, for how else would they get what they want? But it is a very important sentence for a submissive to believe she is entitled to say. "No, thank you, I do not wish it." It is incumbent upon the submissive to know she can say it. A submissive is entitled to say these words, but most of all a submissive is EXPECTED to say these words: how else can "safe, sane, consensual" be enforced? MOST ESPECIALLY with a dominant who is not her master, owner, well-known confidant of many years.
I enjoy a "protected" status (as I've mentioned a few times) as a submissive at Journey to Domination and submission. Well, the whole truth: protected AND precious. I bet my sweet ass. I have not forgotten, Sir Tony! This status means that I recognize my eager-to-please-ness; that I recognize my not-quite-ready-to-decide-without-some-help-ness; that I recognize I am too vulnerable on my own without a mentor to help guide me in big decisions. And by "vulnerable" I mean not the good kind. The good kind is whole, transparent exposure to the eyes of the right dominant. Whole, transparent exposure to the ears, heart, hands, penis, legs, liver, toys... anything the right dominant uses to enjoy his submissive. That's good vulnerability. Bad vulnerability is the feeling of exposure and deception in the presence of the wrong dominant. The dominant who uses your approval-seeking against you in order to accomplish false or temporary or incomplete mastery. The dominant who tries to sneak the collar around your neck without negotiating the strings attached, the responsibilities associated, the promises and the pledges. The dominant who will use you, in other words, instead of helping you grow, and who will not make you a priority in his life that he can talk about openly.
I have been so used, along my journey, and a key learning for me is that I had the power (whether I remembered or not) to get myself out of it, or question it, or interrogate it, or examine it out loud, before it got too bad. And, I did do these things, actually. I wish I had done so sooner, but at least I did eventually. Another key learning in general when in Second Life is that there are folks who will completely disregard what is written in one's profile (even if it's a hard limit) and they will deliberately flout those boundaries (in the name of healthy pushing which subs must also be mindful of... especially when it comes to core values being broken). A submissive will have to say, out loud, in no uncertain terms, "No, thank you, I do not wish it." Unfortunately, a submissive tends to think that, having written it down in her profile, it spares her from having to say the words out loud (because speaking them can be difficult). When talking to a compelling dom, "no" is not always easy to verbalize. And unscrupulous doms rely upon its difficulty, for how else would they get what they want? But it is a very important sentence for a submissive to believe she is entitled to say. "No, thank you, I do not wish it." It is incumbent upon the submissive to know she can say it. A submissive is entitled to say these words, but most of all a submissive is EXPECTED to say these words: how else can "safe, sane, consensual" be enforced? MOST ESPECIALLY with a dominant who is not her master, owner, well-known confidant of many years.
5.24.2012
Fine Lines
This has been quite a week of conversations. I have learned this week more about myself than in recent history combined, and so much has come from being tested with misconceptions. I'll give the benefit of the doubt and not say the word "prejudice" or even "bigotry" but rather call it "misconception" that drives the conversations of recent memory from which I have stepped higher still in my journey to submission. I, too, am guilty of misconception (and my recent post on protected precious sweet asses is evidence of that). Perhaps nobody is immune; we all must learn and no one is born perfect. But, this week especially, I have been challenged on many fronts. It felt surreal, this week, sort of like I was exploring "D/s through the looking glass" instead of just plain old D/s. I think the most important learning I can catalogue this week is HOW perspective changes, and THAT perspective changes, and WHY perspective changes, and the vast difference between the perspective of the new versus the perspective of the very experienced. The difference is in the fine lines.
[Digression: one of my pet peeves in language is the way people abuse the phrase, "There is a fine line between...(insert comparatives here)." There is often not a fine line between the things they suggest, when I stop and think about it, and then I scuff my toe in frustration having wasted all that time. And that is not what I mean to suggest here, either, when I talk about fine lines. There is no fine line demarcating the initiate and the Master. Instead, there is a crude chalk-drawing by a student, a three-stroke stick-figure trying to tell a story it isn't complex enough to convey. Next to it, a finely-wrought image drawn by the Master, an image comprised of a thousand fine lines, conveying a rounder, deeper story that takes hours to appreciate and weeks to analyze. What the new person scratches-out cannot compare to the Masterful image of high complexity. That is what I mean. The fine lines reveal everything.]
The new person: 1) expects things to be obvious, 2) gravitates towards the obvious, 3) leaves heavy footprints through the journey.
The initiate: 1) understands that things are not always as they seem, 2) gravitates more towards what she desires instead of what is obvious and presented by default, 3) tries to walk more softly through the world.
The initiated: 1) begins to develop subtleties that characterize her unique self, 2) begins to assert her desires and hardly pays any attention to the obvious and the default anymore, 3) strives to walk not just softly but without penetrating the rice paper.
The Master: 1) recognizes subtlety in others and celebrates it, while recognizing that the new need guidance also, 2) can anticipate desire and meet it but is never above being surprised by joy, 3) can carry himself and his disciple (if required) with minimal impact to the land beneath.
A simple example: it is confusing (to the new Doms and to the new subs at the beginning, if nobody knows any better) whether a submissive lady should be kneeling by default when a man speaks to her. There are so many competing opinions and values and practices in Second Life, as many different answers to that question as there are practitioners of alternative lifestyles and roleplay. There are so many reasons why a Dom may believe it is appropriate for a girl to kneel when speaking to him. There are so many reasons why a submissive may believe such behaviour to be archaic, misguided, inappropriate to her life's purpose, or totally and perfectly reasonable.
What does submission look like? It looks like whatever you want it to look like. Submissive women wear lingerie and snowsuits and sneakers and pumps (granted, not all at once...). Sometimes a sub wears a collar. Sometimes she doesn't. There are at least a dozen variables (and possibly ten dozen more) affecting whether you see her sporting a collar at any given moment. She may or may not kneel. She may or may not be owned. She may or may not be attached at all, in any relationship. She may be getting over a relationship; she may be entertaining the possibility of a new relationship; she may be withdrawing from any immediate relationships; she may be seeking platonic friendships or protective arms with no other expectations. She may be wearing leather or lace. There is a lot in common, really, with the vanilla lifestyle. But, honestly, there are so many ways to LOOK submissive if one wants to be obvious and catch the attention of the obvious-seeking. There are also so many ways to assert one's subtleties if one is looking to attract the attention of the more discerning (and less obvious) tastes. I have endeavoured to wander the road paved by the discerning. My protected precious sweet ass enjoys the tranquility.
[Digression: one of my pet peeves in language is the way people abuse the phrase, "There is a fine line between...(insert comparatives here)." There is often not a fine line between the things they suggest, when I stop and think about it, and then I scuff my toe in frustration having wasted all that time. And that is not what I mean to suggest here, either, when I talk about fine lines. There is no fine line demarcating the initiate and the Master. Instead, there is a crude chalk-drawing by a student, a three-stroke stick-figure trying to tell a story it isn't complex enough to convey. Next to it, a finely-wrought image drawn by the Master, an image comprised of a thousand fine lines, conveying a rounder, deeper story that takes hours to appreciate and weeks to analyze. What the new person scratches-out cannot compare to the Masterful image of high complexity. That is what I mean. The fine lines reveal everything.]
The new person: 1) expects things to be obvious, 2) gravitates towards the obvious, 3) leaves heavy footprints through the journey.
The initiate: 1) understands that things are not always as they seem, 2) gravitates more towards what she desires instead of what is obvious and presented by default, 3) tries to walk more softly through the world.
The initiated: 1) begins to develop subtleties that characterize her unique self, 2) begins to assert her desires and hardly pays any attention to the obvious and the default anymore, 3) strives to walk not just softly but without penetrating the rice paper.
The Master: 1) recognizes subtlety in others and celebrates it, while recognizing that the new need guidance also, 2) can anticipate desire and meet it but is never above being surprised by joy, 3) can carry himself and his disciple (if required) with minimal impact to the land beneath.
A simple example: it is confusing (to the new Doms and to the new subs at the beginning, if nobody knows any better) whether a submissive lady should be kneeling by default when a man speaks to her. There are so many competing opinions and values and practices in Second Life, as many different answers to that question as there are practitioners of alternative lifestyles and roleplay. There are so many reasons why a Dom may believe it is appropriate for a girl to kneel when speaking to him. There are so many reasons why a submissive may believe such behaviour to be archaic, misguided, inappropriate to her life's purpose, or totally and perfectly reasonable.
What does submission look like? It looks like whatever you want it to look like. Submissive women wear lingerie and snowsuits and sneakers and pumps (granted, not all at once...). Sometimes a sub wears a collar. Sometimes she doesn't. There are at least a dozen variables (and possibly ten dozen more) affecting whether you see her sporting a collar at any given moment. She may or may not kneel. She may or may not be owned. She may or may not be attached at all, in any relationship. She may be getting over a relationship; she may be entertaining the possibility of a new relationship; she may be withdrawing from any immediate relationships; she may be seeking platonic friendships or protective arms with no other expectations. She may be wearing leather or lace. There is a lot in common, really, with the vanilla lifestyle. But, honestly, there are so many ways to LOOK submissive if one wants to be obvious and catch the attention of the obvious-seeking. There are also so many ways to assert one's subtleties if one is looking to attract the attention of the more discerning (and less obvious) tastes. I have endeavoured to wander the road paved by the discerning. My protected precious sweet ass enjoys the tranquility.
5.21.2012
Protected Precious Belongs, Today
When at the Journey to Domination and Submission sim, I wear a group tag. (Second Life residents know about group tags. When you are a member of any kind of community, chances are there is a group to join for membership, and that group will give you a special tag that affords special privileges.) My J2D tag says, "Protected Precious." It is the tag given to submissives. "Seeker" is the tag given to Dominants. Genny, my mentor and the owner of the sim, wears a tag that says "Traveler." I confess, when I first got this "Protected Precious" status, my immediate reaction was privately negative. I was fairly ashamed to wear this tag. It felt princessy. I have never considered myself either protected or precious. It felt, therefore, like a phoney tag that was meant for a hundred other girls that weren't me. I did ask, though, a Dominant and a Master whom I respect probably above all others. "I am not really so very precious, come on?" And his answer was, "You bet your sweet ass you are." This little mini-conversation took place several months ago, but it has stayed with me and replayed over and over like a song that is determined to become the year's favorite. From time to time, it was drowned out by feelings of alienation and separation; feelings of being different; feelings of being so far removed from the groups I long to take part in. I am reminded, almost cruelly sometimes, of how differently I present myself. It makes me feel like a freak. That's my issue, I know.
Then, later on, when I had repeated the conversation to that same Dominant and Master, I had misquoted him. I had said something like, "You bet your ass," and he corrected me. "Anna, I believe I said 'sweet ass'."
This is a blog post about self-esteem. When I showed another Dominant a picture of what I was wearing today, he complimented me and said that it was an enjoyable look. It took me almost half an hour to finally say "thank you" for the compliment. I'm not sure why I find it difficult to accept a compliment sooner and genuinely. I'm not sure why, months ago, I found "sweet" difficult to add when referencing "my ass". I'm not sure why, months ago, I resisted being known as one who is "protected" and one who is "precious". I have come to a decision, though. While I examine these personal foibles of mine privately, I will embrace their opposites publicly. Time for affirmations! I am Anna, geisha name Choji, and my sweet ass is protected and precious. My sweet ass is protected, precious, and proud of it. My sweet ass is protected, precious, proud of it, and in the mood to say so. My sweet ass is intelligent, thoughtful, and very often in need of protecting given how precious it is. My sweet ass gives a wiggle and a can-can-kick or two. My sweet ass sits on a throne of trust supported by balloons of hope sailing over the hammock of aftercare, waving at the amazing Dominant and Master who taught me, months ago, that it's not because I'm any different from anybody else -- it's actually because I am special like everybody else, that I am as precious as everybody else, and just as protected. Today I feel like I belong. Today is a good day.
Then, later on, when I had repeated the conversation to that same Dominant and Master, I had misquoted him. I had said something like, "You bet your ass," and he corrected me. "Anna, I believe I said 'sweet ass'."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
When Enough is Enough
There are rules of engagement between practitioners of the BDSM lifestyle. Outside of the world of BDSM, however, to break these rules co...
-
Power imbalance from the bottom is an idea that doesn't (in my humble opinion) get enough exposure in the world. It is part of the id...
-
Why spend so much time exploring self-esteem? I wish the answer to that question were not so obvious in my own experiences with people. ...
-
A woman asked, recently, in a discussion about submission: what is the difference between BDSM and abuse? It's a loaded question and ...









