There would be no shame without curiosity. It is not real shame (is it?) if we did not ask for a little bit of it. Or, more than a little bit. Curiosity is the beginning of shame. In the story of Eve with Adam in Paradise, it is curiosity (not defiance) that claims Eve's innocence. It is not that she wanted to upset God. It is not that she tried to get Adam in trouble. It is a very simple motive that changes poor Eve forever after: curiosity.
With curiosity comes temptation. With temptation comes indulgence. And, from indulgence derives gratification which, alas, feels so good... or feels terrible. It depends. But, in the end, the terrible feeling is shame.
It is the terrible feeling anorexics feel for eating food. It is the terrible feeling alcoholics feel for drinking whiskey. It is the terrible feeling pedophiles feel when looking at a child in short pants. It is the terrible feeling victims of bullies feel when they read the text message that says "Everybody thinks you smell foul." The shame comes after the eating; after the drinking; after the looking; after the clicking and opening and reading. The shame comes after the curiosity.
Shame comes from secrets. The secret is the closet where shame resides, hangs up its hat and coat, settles in. The secret is the darkness and safety of that closet. We know where that closet is, what hides inside. We know, because we shut the door and keep it safe. We know because we volunteer, in this act of shame-keeping, to give the secret a good home. Sometimes it is for good, that we keep this secret. It protects people. Sometimes it is for worse, that we keep this secret: it hurts people and we are too weak to change it. Shame relies on this secret, though, however we look at it. Shame relies on this secret, and relies on our ability to hold that closet door closed.
If we do not keep that door closed, then shame will no longer be private: shame will become public embarrassment. Shame will become the object of public scorn, and then guilt blossoms from the garden of soiled embarrassment. The danger with shame is the imbalance of power, again: shame has the potential to destroy every carefully-balanced arrangement.
Shame, Guilt, and Embarrassment co-exist in this way: shame is private; embarrassment is public; and guilt is the responsibility of the individual to action, somehow -- rightly or wrongly.
A personal journey through my D/s lifestyle, Mastered and loved. Unauthorized use is prohibited; you may read, and you may discuss, and you may not share without my enthusiastic, explicit permission.
Showing posts with label closet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label closet. Show all posts
8.12.2012
8.09.2012
Shame, Part Two
"Kink shame" and "shame as kink" are two different things. Some people are ashamed of their kinks; and some are turned on as a kink by the idea of shame.
I spent a great deal of my second life (the first time around) dead-ashamed of my kinks. (I mean, the "G" word. My first BDSM fantasies were, counter-intuitively, Gorean. And I'd never even heard of Gor before Second Life, so this was quite an awakening.) I was not ashamed to live my fantasies of sexual slavery and participate actively -- only ashamed to associate my fantasy self with my real self and to introduce both selves to each other. Often, it is shame that prevents many people from integrating their first and second lives: the feelings of shame lead to this behaviour of dividing (sometimes with a violence) the two lives. In extreme cases, it is this shame that prevents the real self from meeting the fantasy self. Living in the closet is a painful experience: one divides the self and it doesn't feel very good. I am sure this theory applies to more than just "kink" and Second Life. I am sure the idea of living in the closet is more common than society would be comfortable admitting.
In my series of interviews around "shame" I met many people who keep a careful array of closets. Closets for reasons of gender, for reasons of sexual orientation, for reasons of shame and kinks... there are many reasons a person will hide part of oneself from the rest of the world.
I know that in my case, I have struggled in the past with asserting a confident sense of self. Second Life has really helped me achieve a better (and loveable) sense of self. I feel more confident saying to people "I need this." I feel more confident saying to people, "I will not tolerate this." I know the difference between fantasy and reality: and I know that I do not want one to become the other, but I would like both to have their own special places in my life. This took quite a bit of time to articulate, finally. Naturally, I wish that I could go back to the beginning knowing then what I know now. Knowing that there is no shame (objectively) to wanting and desiring. Knowing that I have a valid, loveable self that can play nice and contribute fun things. Knowing that when someone acts like an ass, it's not because of something I did but, rather, that person is quite separately an ass regardless of me.
I'm over my kink-shame in much the same way that I am over my "invalid self" feelings. I know I have a lot of people to thank for this. I'm grateful for each and every one of them.
I spent a great deal of my second life (the first time around) dead-ashamed of my kinks. (I mean, the "G" word. My first BDSM fantasies were, counter-intuitively, Gorean. And I'd never even heard of Gor before Second Life, so this was quite an awakening.) I was not ashamed to live my fantasies of sexual slavery and participate actively -- only ashamed to associate my fantasy self with my real self and to introduce both selves to each other. Often, it is shame that prevents many people from integrating their first and second lives: the feelings of shame lead to this behaviour of dividing (sometimes with a violence) the two lives. In extreme cases, it is this shame that prevents the real self from meeting the fantasy self. Living in the closet is a painful experience: one divides the self and it doesn't feel very good. I am sure this theory applies to more than just "kink" and Second Life. I am sure the idea of living in the closet is more common than society would be comfortable admitting.
In my series of interviews around "shame" I met many people who keep a careful array of closets. Closets for reasons of gender, for reasons of sexual orientation, for reasons of shame and kinks... there are many reasons a person will hide part of oneself from the rest of the world.
I know that in my case, I have struggled in the past with asserting a confident sense of self. Second Life has really helped me achieve a better (and loveable) sense of self. I feel more confident saying to people "I need this." I feel more confident saying to people, "I will not tolerate this." I know the difference between fantasy and reality: and I know that I do not want one to become the other, but I would like both to have their own special places in my life. This took quite a bit of time to articulate, finally. Naturally, I wish that I could go back to the beginning knowing then what I know now. Knowing that there is no shame (objectively) to wanting and desiring. Knowing that I have a valid, loveable self that can play nice and contribute fun things. Knowing that when someone acts like an ass, it's not because of something I did but, rather, that person is quite separately an ass regardless of me.
I'm over my kink-shame in much the same way that I am over my "invalid self" feelings. I know I have a lot of people to thank for this. I'm grateful for each and every one of them.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
When Enough is Enough
There are rules of engagement between practitioners of the BDSM lifestyle. Outside of the world of BDSM, however, to break these rules co...
-
Power imbalance from the bottom is an idea that doesn't (in my humble opinion) get enough exposure in the world. It is part of the id...
-
Why spend so much time exploring self-esteem? I wish the answer to that question were not so obvious in my own experiences with people. ...
-
A woman asked, recently, in a discussion about submission: what is the difference between BDSM and abuse? It's a loaded question and ...


